ReviewDrugs1998
Recognition and treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Review in Drugs, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis can be made only after exclusion of other entities such as neoplasm, toxic treatments, collagen vascular diseases, occupational exposure or granulomatous diseases, such as sarcoidosis. The repercussions on gas exchanges are the most reliable indications of the severity of the disease, the measure of lung volume or chest x-rays alone often being misleading. Biopsies obtained during transbronchial procedures by thoracoscopies or thoracotomy are of great help, but mainly to rule out other diseases. In many cases, only a high resolution computerised tomography (CT) scan and bronchoalveolar lavage are performed to rule out infection or tumour and to assess the inflammatory state of the disease. Due to the fact that barely a quarter of patients respond to corticosteroids alone, cytostatics (in particular azathioprine) are often prescribed simultaneously with low dose corticosteroids, either initially or after an unsuccessful trial of corticosteroids. Cyclosporin has been useful for only a limited number of patients. Colchicine has been shown useful in an open trial but its role still needs to be assessed. Anticytokine therapy and the role of substances such as relaxin are still at the experimental stage. Lung transplantation is now a therapeutic option for selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.