ArticleGenetics1998
Evidence for a multistep control in transposition of I factor in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Genetics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distribution, evolution, and diversity of retrotransposons at the flamenco locus reflect the regulatory properties of piRNA clusters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Artificial and epigenetic regulation of the I factor, a nonviral retrotransposon of Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drosophila melanogaster strains belong to one of two interactive categories, inducer (I) or reactive (R), with respect to the I-R system of hybrid dysgenesis. The dysgenic interaction results from the presence of several transposition-competent copies of a LINE-like element, the I factor, only in the genome of I strains. When a cross is performed between I males and R females, I factor transposes at high frequency in the germ line of F1 daughters, known as SF females. This transposition burst results in the sterility of SF females. I factor transposes by reverse transcription of a full-length transcript. Specific RT-PCR experiments were done to compare the amount of I factor transcript in samples corresponding to various transposition frequencies. The sensitivity of the method allowed the ready detection of the I factor RNA in every tissue and genetic background examined. Comparison of amplification signals suggests that I factor activity in ovaries is regulated at different levels. First, the amount of I factor RNA subjected to negative and positive regulation. Whereas the negative control, which limits transposition in nonpermissive contexts, may be exerted by an I factor encoded repressor function, the positive control is linked to reactivity level, a cellular state maternally inherited from R mothers. Additionally, negative regulation is also exerted downstream of I factor RNA. This differs notably from previous conclusions in which transcription was envisaged as the main level of regulation of the I factor transposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.