ArticleGenetics1998
The spectrum of acridine resistant mutants of bacteriophage T4 reveals cryptic effects of the tsL141 DNA polymerase allele on spontaneous mutagenesis.
Article in Genetics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sustained in situ protein production and release in the mammalian gut by an engineered bacteriophage.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Synthetic and Functional Engineering of Bacteriophages: Approaches for Tailored Bactericidal, Diagnostic, and Delivery Platforms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- John W. (Jan) Drake: A Biochemical View of a GeneticistGenetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Engineering processive DNA polymerases with maximum benefit at minimum cost.Frontiers in microbiology · 2014Article
- Identification of a new motif in family B DNA polymerases by mutational analyses of the bacteriophage t4 DNA polymerase.Journal of molecular biology · 2010Article
- Bacteriophage T4 genome.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2003Review
- Bacteriophage T4 rnh (RNase H) null mutations: effects on spontaneous mutation and epistatic interaction with rII mutations.Journal of bacteriology · 1999Article
- Regulation of DNA polymerase exonucleolytic proofreading activity: studies of bacteriophage T4 "antimutator" DNA polymerases.Genetics · 1998Review
- Too many mutants with multiple mutations.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mutations in the ac gene of bacteriophage T4 confer resistance to acridine-inhibition of phage development. Previous studies had localized the ac gene region; we show that inactivation of T4 Open Reading Frame 52.2 confers the Acr phenotype. Thus, 52.2 is ac. The resistance mechanism is unknown. The ac gene provides a convenient forward mutagenesis assay. Its compact size (156 bp) simplifies mutant sequencing and diverse mutant types are found: base substitutions leading to missense or nonsense codons, in-frame deletions or duplications within the coding sequence, deletion or duplication frameshifts, insertions, complex mutations, and large deletions extending into neighboring sequences. Comparisons of spontaneous mutagenesis between phages bearing the wild-type or tsL141 alleles of DNA polymerase demonstrate that the impact of the mutant polymerase is cryptic when total spontaneous mutant frequencies are compared, but the DNA sequences of the ac mutants reveal a substantial alteration of fidelity by the mutant polymerase. The patterns of base substitution mutagenesis suggest that some site-specific mutation rate effects may reflect hotspots for mutagenesis arising by different mechanisms. A new class of spontaneous duplication mutations, having sequences inconsistent with misaligned pairing models, but consistent with nick-processing errors, has been identified at a hotspot in ac.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.