Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9560365›Full record

ReviewGenetics1998

Adaptive mutation: has the unicorn landed?

P L Foster

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adaptive mutation: implications for evolution.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2000
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2000
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P L FosterDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts 02118-2394, USA. pfoster@bu.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reversion of an episomal Lac- allele during lactose selection has been studied as a model for adaptive mutation. Although recent results show that the mutations that arise during selection are not "adaptive" in the original sense, the mutagenic mechanism that produces these mutations may nonetheless be of evolutionary significance. In addition, a transient mutational state induced in a subpopulation of starving cells could provide a species with a mechanism for adaptive evolution.

Indexed as

MutationAdaptation, BiologicalBiological EvolutionEscherichia coliLac OperonModels, GeneticRec A RecombinasesSelection, GeneticRec A Recombinases

Identifiers

PMID9560365
PMCPMC1460081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.