Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9559811›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1998

Fluconazole pharmacokinetics in burn patients.

B A Boucher, S R King, H L Wandschneider, W L Hickerson, S D Hanes, V L Herring, T W Canada, M M Hess

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of Voriconazole and Posaconazole Dosing in Patients With Thermal Burn Injuries.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in burn and non-burn rabbits.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2015
    Article
  6. [Not Available].Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2015
    Article
  7. Penetration of micafungin into the burn eschar in patients with severe burns.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

B A BoucherDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163, USA. bboucher@utmem1.utmem.edu
S R King
H L Wandschneider
W L Hickerson
S D Hanes
V L Herring
T W Canada
M M Hess

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in nine adult patients with severe (30 to 95% total body surface area) burns were studied. There was no significant difference in half-life (t1/2), clearance (CL), or volume of distribution (V) over time in five patients on days 3 and 8 of the study (P > 0.05). Combined parameter estimates (means +/- standard deviations) for all nine patients for the two study periods were as follows: t1/2, 24.4 +/- 5.8 h; CL, 0.36 +/- 0.09 ml/min/kg; and V, 0.72 +/- 0.12 liters/kg. These estimates of t1/2 and CL in burn patients were approximately 13% shorter and 30% more rapid, respectively, than the most extreme estimates reported for other populations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntifungal AgentsArea Under CurveBurnsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFluconazoleHalf-LifeHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID9559811
PMCPMC105570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.