Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9559795›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1998

Population pharmacokinetic study of amikacin administered once or twice daily to febrile, severely neutropenic adults.

M Tod, O Lortholary, D Seytre, R Semaoun, B Uzzan, L Guillevin, P Casassus, O Petitjean

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. SCOUT: An Exploratory Approach to Scouting Dose-Relevant Covariates.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M TodHôpital Avicenne, and Centre de Recherche en Pathologie Infectieuse et Tropicale 93, UFR de Médecine Paris-Nord, Bobigny, France. michel.tod@ave.ap-hop-paris.fr
O Lortholary
D Seytre
R Semaoun
B Uzzan
L Guillevin
P Casassus
O Petitjean
Service de la Santé Publique · CHHôpital Avicenne · FRPharmac · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Once-daily (o.d.) administration of 20 mg of amikacin per kg of body weight to neutropenic patients has been validated by clinical studies, but amikacin pharmacokinetics have been documented only for the 7.5-mg/kg twice-daily (b.i.d.) regimen in this population. In order to determine in neutropenic patients (i) the influence of the dosing regimen on the kinetics of amikacin, (ii) the linearity of kinetics of amikacin in the range of 7.5 to 20 mg/kg, and (iii) the influence of patient characteristics on the disposition of amikacin and (iv) to provide a rationale for dosing recommendations, we evaluated the population pharmacokinetics of amikacin administered to 57 febrile neutropenic adults (neutrophil count, <500/mm3) being treated for a hematological disorder and receiving amikacin at 7.5 mg/kg b.i.d. (n = 29) or 20 mg/kg o.d. (n = 28) and administered intravenously over 0.5 h. A total of 278 blood samples were obtained (1 to 14 samples per patient) during one or several administration intervals (1 to 47). Serum amikacin levels were measured by the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique. A mixed-effect modeling approach was used to fit a bicompartmental model to the data (NONMEM software). The influences of the dosing regimen and the demographic and biological indices on the pharmacokinetic parameters of amikacin were evaluated by the maximum-likelihood ratio test on the population model. The dosing regimen had no influence on amikacin pharmacokinetic parameters, i.e., the kinetics of amikacin were linear over the range of 7.5 to 20 mg/kg. Amikacin elimination clearance (CL) was only correlated with creatinine clearance or its covariates, namely, sex, age, body weight, and serum creatinine level. The interindividual variability of CL was 21%, while those of the central volume of distribution, the distribution clearance, and the tissue volume of distribution were 15, 30, and 25%, respectively. On the basis of the expected distribution of amikacin concentrations in this population, dosing recommendations as a function of creatinine clearance (CL[CR]) are proposed: for patients with normal renal function (CL[CR] of 80 to 130 ml/min), 20 mg/kg o.d. is recommended, whereas for patients with severe renal impairment (CL[CR], 10 to 20 ml/min), a dosage of 17 mg/kg every 48 h is recommended.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCreatinineEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFeverHumansKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalNeutropeniaAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID9559795
PMCPMC105554
OpenAlexW2103170057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.