ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal1998
Culture of human main pancreatic duct epithelial cells.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cystic Fibrosis of the Pancreas: In Vitro Duct Models for CFTR-Targeted Translational Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- The long coding RNA AFAP1-AS1 promotes tumor cell growth and invasion in pancreatic cancer through upregulating the IGF1R oncogene via sequestration of miR-133a.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2018Article
- MicroRNA-323-3p inhibits cell invasion and metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via direct suppression of SMAD2 and SMAD3.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- In vitro models of pancreatic cancer for translational oncology research.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2009Article
- Article
- Immortal human pancreatic duct epithelial cell lines with near normal genotype and phenotype.The American journal of pathology · 2000Article
- Reconstituted human oral and esophageal mucosa in culture.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Attempts to grow human pancreatic duct epithelial cells in long-term culture have proven difficult. We have developed a system of growing these cells for several passages by adapting methods used to culture dog pancreatic duct cells. Epithelial cells were enzymatically dissociated from the main pancreatic duct and plated onto collagen-coated culture inserts suspended above a human fibroblast feeder layer. After primary culture, the cells were either passaged onto new inserts or plastic tissue culture plates in the absence of collagen. Cells grown on the latter plates were maintained in a serum-free medium. Primary pancreatic duct epithelial cells grow steadily to confluence as a monolayer in the feeder layer system. After primary culture, cells passaged onto new inserts with fresh feeder layer or plastic plates and fed with serum-free medium continued to develop into confluent monolayers for up to four passages. The cells were columnar with prominent apical microvilli, sub-apical secretory vesicles, and lateral intercellular junctions resembling the morphology of normal in vivo epithelial cells. These cells were also positive for cytokeratin 19, 7, and 8 and carbonic anhydrase II, as measured by immunohistochemistry. Metabolically, these cells synthesized and secreted mucin, as measured by incorporation of tritiated N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. In conclusion, we demonstrated that human pancreatic epithelial cells from the main duct can be successfully grown in culture and repeatedly passaged using a feeder layer system, with serum-free medium, and in organotypic cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.