Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9554897›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998

Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in critically ill adult patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

R D'Amico, S Pifferi, C Leonetti, V Torri, A Tinazzi, A Liberati

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
37.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 454 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in polytrauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Pneumonia in Trauma Patients.Current trauma reports · 2017
    Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R D'AmicoMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, 20157 Milan, Italy.
S Pifferi
C Leonetti
V Torri
A Tinazzi
A Liberati
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITOspedale Maggiore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduces respiratory tract infections and overall mortality in unselected critically ill adult patients.

designMeta-analysis of randomised controlled trials from 1984 and 1996 that compared different forms of antibiotic prophylaxis used to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality with aggregate data and, in a subset of trials, data from individual patients. SUBJECTS: Unselected critically ill adult patients; 5727 patients for aggregate data meta-analysis, 4343 for confirmatory meta-analysis with data from individual patients.

main outcome measuresRespiratory tract infections and total mortality.

resultsTwo categories of eligible trials were defined: topical plus systemic antibiotics versus no treatment and topical preparation with or without a systemic antibiotic versus a systemic agent or placebo. Estimates from aggregate data meta-analysis of 16 trials (3361 patients) that tested combined treatment indicated a strong significant reduction in infection (odds ratio 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.41) and total mortality (0.80; 0.69 to 0.93). With this treatment five and 23 patients would need to be treated to prevent one infection and one death, respectively. Similar analysis of 17 trials (2366 patients) that tested only topical antibiotics indicated a clear reduction in infection (0.56; 0.46 to 0.68) without a significant effect on total mortality (1.01; 0.84 to 1.22). Analysis of data from individual patients yielded similar results. No significant differences in treatment effect by major subgroups of patients emerged from the analyses.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis of 15 years of clinical research suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis with a combination of topical and systemic drugs can reduce respiratory tract infections and overall mortality in critically ill patients. This effect is significant and worth while, and it should be considered when practice guidelines are defined.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAdministration, TopicalAdultAgedAntibiotic ProphylaxisCritical CareCritical IllnessCross InfectionDeveloped CountriesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationHospitalsHumansMiddle AgedQuality ControlRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID9554897
PMCPMC28528
OpenAlexW2035281372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.