ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998
Informed consent in medical research.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel consent process for research in dying patients unable to give consent.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Trial
- Therapeutic nursing or unblocking beds? A randomised controlled trial of a post-acute intermediate care unit.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Trial
- Article
- Article
- Ethics in biological anthropology.American journal of physical anthropology · 2018Review
- Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.BMC medical ethics · 2016Review
- The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble.Journal of medical ethics · 2015Article
- Therapeutic misconception: hope, trust and misconception in paediatric research.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2014Review
- What potential research participants want to know about research: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2012Article
- Understanding of research: a Sri Lankan perspective.BMC medical ethics · 2010Article
- Reporting of ethical standards: differences between complementary and orthodox medicine journals?Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2004Article
- Assessing ethics of trials in systematic reviews.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Review
- Modified informed consent procedure: consent to postponed information.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Article
- Confidentiality and the ethics of medical ethics.Journal of medical ethics · 2003Article
- The quality improvement-research divide and the need for external oversight.American journal of public health · 2001Review
- Research misconduct: Britain's failure to act.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- Data protection legislation: interpretation and barriers to research.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- Informed consent. Numbers inform the debate.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1998Article
- Informed consent: edging forwards (and backwards)BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1998Article
- A practical guide to informed consent to treatment.BMJ (Clinical research ed.)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.