Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9545069›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1998

Comparison of secretory responses as measured by membrane capacitance and by amperometry.

M Haller, C Heinemann, R H Chow, R Heidelberger, E Neher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Electrochemical measurement of quantal exocytosis using microchips.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Amperometric resolution of a prespike stammer and evoked phases of fast release from retinal bipolar cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quantal ATP release in rat beta-cells by exocytosis of insulin-containing LDCVs.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M HallerDepartment of Membrane Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
C Heinemann
R H Chow
R Heidelberger
E Neher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have compared capacitance and amperometric measurements in bovine chromaffin cells when secretion was elicited by flash photolysis of caged-calcium or step depolarizations. Total amperometric charge depended linearly on the amount of capacitance increase in both types of experiments. Furthermore, the properties of resolvable amperometric spikes after flashes were comparable to those observed after depolarizations, and their timing was compatible with the rate of capacitance increase. For a more detailed comparison, we used Monte Carlo simulations of multiple amperometric events occurring randomly over the surface of a sphere and summing together, to generate a reference amperometric signal for a given measured capacitance increase. Even after correction for endocytotic processes, the time courses of the integrated experimental records lagged behind the integrated Monte Carlo records by approximately 50 ms in flash and depolarization experiments. This delay was larger by approximately 40 ms than what can be expected from the "pre-foot delay" or the foot duration. Possible sources for the remaining delay could be diffusional barriers like the patch-pipette and the chamber bottom, which are not taken into account in the model. We also applied a novel type of fluctuation analysis to estimate the relative quantum size of an amperometric event. On average the estimates from experimental amperometric traces, in both flash and depolarization experiments, were 3-5 times smaller than estimates from simulated ones. This discrepancy can be due to contributions to the amperometric current from small vesicles, preferred release from cellular regions orientated toward the chamber bottom, or abundance of "foot-only" events. In conclusion, amperometric signals in flash and depolarization experiments displayed similar delayed average time courses and a lower estimate for the relative quantum size compared to the modeled amperometric signals. However, individual amperometric spikes were in agreement with expectations derived from capacitance signals.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsCalciumCattleCell DegranulationChromaffin CellsElectric ConductivityElectrochemistryExocytosisIn Vitro TechniquesMembrane PotentialsModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodPhotolysisAdenosine TriphosphateCalcium

Identifiers

PMID9545069
PMCPMC1299551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.