Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9545027›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1998

Compliant realignment of binding sites in muscle: transient behavior and mechanical tuning.

T L Daniel, A C Trimble, P B Chase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modeling cardiac contractile cooperativity across species.The Journal of general physiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The distinctive mechanical and structural signatures of residual force enhancement in myofibers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. In defense of Huxley.Biophysical journal · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nucleus Mechanosensing in Cardiomyocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T L DanielDepartment of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-1800, USA. danielt@zoology.washington.edu
A C Trimble
P B Chase

Funding

REGULATION OF ACTOMYOSIN INTERACTIONS IN CARDIAC MUSCLESP01HL052558 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CHASE, P. BRYANT · 1994 to 1998
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL 52558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of compliance in the lattice of filaments in muscle raises a number of concerns about how one accounts for force generation in the context of the cross-bridge cycle--binding site motions and coupling between cross-bridges confound more traditional analyses. To explore these issues, we developed a spatially explicit, mechanochemical model of skeletal muscle contraction. With a simple three-state model of the cross-bridge cycle, we used a Monte Carlo simulation to compute the instantaneous balance of forces throughout the filament lattice, accounting for both thin and thick filament distortions in response to cross-bridge forces. This approach is compared to more traditional mass action kinetic models (in the form of coupled partial differential equations) that assume filament inextensibility. We also monitored instantaneous force generation, ATP utilization, and the dynamics of the cross-bridge cycle in simulations of step changes in length and variations in shortening velocity. Three critical results emerge from our analyses: 1) there is a significant realignment of actin-binding sites in response to cross-bridge forces, 2) this realignment recruits additional cross-bridge binding, and 3) we predict mechanical behaviors that are consistent with experimental results for velocity and length transients. Binding site realignment depends on the relative compliance of the filament lattice and cross-bridges, and within the measured range of these parameters, gives rise to a sharply tuned peak for force generation. Such mechanical tuning at the molecular level is the result of mechanical coupling between individual cross-bridges, mediated by thick filament deformations, and the resultant realignment of binding sites on the thin filament.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsBinding SitesBiomechanical PhenomenaBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsComplianceEnergy MetabolismIsometric ContractionModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalSarcomeresActins

Identifiers

PMID9545027
PMCPMC1299509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.