Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9539439›Full record

ArticleGenetics1998

Patterns of Y and X chromosome DNA sequence divergence during the Felidae radiation.

J Pecon Slattery, S J O'Brien

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sperm competition can drive a male-biased mutation rate.Journal of theoretical biology · 2007
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel gene conversion between X-Y homologues located in the nonrecombining region of the Y chromosome in Felidae (Mammalia).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Pecon SlatteryLaboratory of Genomic Diversity, Frederick Cancer and Research and Development Center, National Cancer Institute, Maryland 21702, USA. slattery@fcrfv2.ncifcrf.gov
S J O'Brien
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 37 species of modern cats have evolved from approximately eight phylogenetic lineages within the past 10 to 15 million years. The Felidae family has been described with multiple measures of morphologic and molecular evolutionary methods that serve as a framework for tracking gene divergence during brief evolutionary periods. In this report, we compare the mode and tempo of evolution of noncoding sequences of a large intron within Zfy (783 bp) and Zfx (854 bp), homologous genes located on the felid Y and X chromosomes, respectively. Zfy sequence variation evolves at about twice the rate of Zfx, and both gene intron sequences track feline hierarchical topologies accurately. As homoplasies are infrequent in patterns of nucleotide substitution, the Y chromosome sequence displays a remarkable degree of phylogenetic consistency among cat species and provides a highly informative glimpse of divergence of sex chromosome sequences in Felidae.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationX ChromosomeY ChromosomeAnimalsCarnivoraCatsDNA-Binding ProteinsIntronsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMutagenesisPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsTranscription Factorszinc finger protein, X-linked

Identifiers

PMID9539439
PMCPMC1460026
OpenAlexW2142768528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.