Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9529419›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998

Interprofessional working and continuing medical education.

L A Headrick, P M Wilcock, P B Batalden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The learning organisation and health care education.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2007
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of evidence for interprofessional education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2006
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Dorset Seedcorn Project: interprofessional learning and continuous quality improvement in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L A HeadrickDepartment of Medicine, Metro Health Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA. lah5@po.cwru.edu
P M Wilcock
P B Batalden

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingInterprofessional RelationsClinical CompetenceHumansPatient Care TeamQuality of Health CareUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID9529419
PMCPMC1112732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.