Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9528836›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer1998

Assay of matrix metalloproteinases types 1, 2, 3 and 9 in breast cancer.

A G Remacle, A Noël, C Duggan, E McDermott, N O'Higgins, J M Foidart, M J Duffy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Contribution of p53 to metastasis.Cancer discovery · 2014
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Increased expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A G RemacleLaboratory of Biology, University of Liège, Belgium.
A Noël
C Duggan
E McDermott
N O'Higgins
J M Foidart
M J Duffy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are zinc dependent endopeptidases implicated in cancer invasion and metastasis. Gelatin zymography was performed on 84 human breast carcinomas and seven normal breast tissues. The precursor form of MMP-2 (72 kDa) was found in 11 (12%) samples, while its two activated forms, i.e. 62 kDa and 59 kDa, were found in three (6%) and 34 (40%) samples respectively. In contrast to MMP-2, most of the samples (52%) contained MMP-9 in its precursor form. Using ELISA, MMP-1 levels were found in 12% of the samples while MMP-3 levels were found in only 2% of the samples. Levels of MMP-2, -3 and -9 correlated inversely with numbers of nodal metastases. Neither MMP-2 nor -9 levels were significantly related to patient outcome. However, patients with high levels of a 50-kDa gelatinase band after zymography had a significantly better survival than patients with low levels. This species was never observed in normal breast tissue.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsCollagenasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGelatinasesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMatrix Metalloproteinase 1Matrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 3Matrix Metalloproteinase 9MetalloendopeptidasesMolecular WeightPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenCollagenasesGelatinasesMatrix Metalloproteinase 1Matrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 3Matrix Metalloproteinase 9MetalloendopeptidasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID9528836
PMCPMC2150110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.