ReviewCellular and molecular neurobiology1998
Intrinsic controls of intracellular calcium and intercellular communication in the regulation of neuroendocrine cell activity.
Review in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endocrine Disorders of Calcium Signaling in Children: Neuroendocrine Crosstalk and Clinical Implications.Cells · 2026Review
- Regulation of activity-dependent dendritic vasopressin release from rat supraoptic neurones.The Journal of physiology · 2005Article
- Priming of excitatory synapses by alpha1 adrenoceptor-mediated inhibition of group III metabotropic glutamate receptors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The magnocellular hypothalamoneurohypophysial system, consisting chiefly of the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei and their axonal projections to the pituitary neural lobe, has become a model for the study of neuroendocrine cell morphology, function, and plasticity. 2. Decades of research have produced a wealth of knowledge about the physiological conditions that activate this system, the peripheral target tissues affected by its outputs, and its capacity to undergo use-dependent, reversible reorganization. 3. Earlier research on the neural control of this system concentrated largely on the synaptic inputs that influence the activity of these magnocellular neurons and, while that task is still far from completed, methods have now been developed that permit insights to be gained into the control exercised by intrinsic cellular and molecular mechanisms. 4. This article reviews the current state of knowledge of roles played by these intrinsic mechanisms, including influences of intracellular calcium buffering, calcium release from internal stores and intercellular communication through gap junctions, in the control of neuroendocrine cell activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.