ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis1998
Quantitative measurement of serum HCV RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C: comparison between Amplicor HCV monitor system and branched DNA signal amplification assay.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic variation of hepatitis C virus in a cohort of injection heroin users in Wuhan, China.Virus research · 2008Article
- Health-related quality of life and impact of antiviral treatment in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis C in Taiwan.World journal of gastroenterology · 2005Article
- Clinical significance of hepatitis C virus genotypes.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2000Review
- Hepatitis C virus quantitation: optimization of strategies for detecting low-level viremia.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2000Article
- Genotype dependence of hepatitis C virus load measurement in commercially available quantitative assays.Journal of clinical microbiology · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative measurement of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is important in predicting and monitoring the therapeutic effects of interferon in treating patients with chronic hepatitis C. We compared two commercial available assays, Roche Amplicor HCV Monitor test kits and Chiron branched DNA signal amplification (bDNA) assay, in quantitative measurement of serum HCV RNA in 74 patients with chronic hepatitis C. The serum HCV RNA of each of these patients was qualitatively positive by conventional reverse transcription-nested polymerase chain reaction. Serum HCV RNA was detected positive by the Amplicor test kits in 63 (85%) patients and by the bDNA assay in 58 (78%) patients (P > 0.05). The quantitative results of HCV RNA detected by both assays showed a good linear correlation (r = 0.56, P < 0.001). Amplicor test kits detected 5 patients with low viremia which were below the detection limit of the bDNA assay (2.0 x 10(5) genome equivalents/ml). However, the mean HCV RNA values detected by the Amplicor test kits was 1.26 log lower than that of the bDNA assay. The Amplicor test kits detected only 5 samples (8%) with a HCV RNA value greater than 5 x 10(6) copies/ml, while the bDNA assay detected 23 samples (40%) with a HCV RNA value greater than 5 x 10(6) genome equivalents/ml (P < 0.01). HCV genotype did not affect the positive rate of HCV RNA measurement detected by both assays. However, a significantly higher mean serum HCV RNA value was noted in HCV genotype 1b as compared with the other genotypes. We concluded that the Roche Amplicor HCV Monitor test kits and the Chiron branched DNA signal amplification assay are equally sensitive in the quantitative measurement of serum HCV RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C and can be reliably used in measuring HCV viremia clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9524297PMC6807786W2032225479What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.