Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9519515›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1997

The general practitioner, the drug misuser, and the alcohol misuser: major differences in general practitioner activity, therapeutic commitment, and 'shared care' proposals.

A Deehan, C Taylor, J Strang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Opioids for managing chronic non-malignant pain: safe and effective prescribing.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2006
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The prescribing of methadone and other opioids to addicts: national survey of GPs in England and Wales.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
  17. Difficult behaviour in drug-misusing and non-drug-misusing patients in general practice--a comparison.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Tackling alcohol misuse: opportunities and obstacles in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Review
  20. Primary care services for problem drug users.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A DeehanNational Addiction Centre, London.
C Taylor
J Strang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary care setting has been regarded in government policy and the scientific literature as an ideal setting for the work needed to meet the Health of the Nation drug and alcohol targets. Although studies have pointed to the negative attitudes held by general practitioners (GPs) towards alcohol- and drug-misusing patients, there has been no direct comparison of the work and attitudes of the GP towards these patients.

aimTo compare the work and attitudes of GPs towards alcohol- and drug-misusing patients.

methodAll GPs in an outer London area (157 doctors) were surveyed, using an eight-page postal questionnaire, collecting clinical and attitudinal data alongside demographics and practice information. A response rate of 52% was achieved.

resultsGeneral practitioners reported working with only 3.5 patients drinking above recommended guidelines in the previous four working weeks, and even fewer drug-using patients (0.75). While they viewed the alcohol-misusing patients negatively, the drug misuser elicited substantially more negative attitudes. The primary care setting was seen as appropriate to work with the alcohol-misusing patient but not with drug users. Training and support from local services would encourage substantially more GPs to work with alcohol misusers but not with drug misusers.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that there are some cautious grounds for optimism that GPs are willing to work with alcohol misusers; however, with regard to drug misusers, we find a GP workforce that is only minimally involved with this group and would not be greatly encouraged by the provision of additional training, support, or incentives. The Health of the Nation targets are not being met, and GPs are not detecting adequate numbers of the patients at whom these targets are aimed. Emphasis has been placed on the role of primary care, but the real achievements that can be made require detection of the less severe drinkers and injecting drug misusers.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdolescentAdultAlcoholismAttitude to HealthFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians, FamilySalaries and Fringe BenefitsSocial SupportSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID9519515
PMCPMC1409931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.