Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9519128›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health1997

Life expectancy in England: variations and trends by gender, health authority, and level of deprivation.

V S Raleigh, V A Kiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Driver License Renewal Laws and Older Adults' Daily Driving, United States, 2003-2017.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Relationships between community social capital and injury in Canadian adolescents: a multilevel analysis.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Divergent trends in suicide by socio-economic status in Australia.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2006
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact of nursing home deaths on life expectancy calculations in small areas.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2004
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

V S RaleighNational Institute of Epidemiology, University of Surrey, Guildford.
V A Kiri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesTo investigate variations and trends in life expectancy in English district health authorities in relation to gender and Jarman deprivation level.

designMortality data for English health authorities from 1984-94, compiled by the Office for National Statistics, were assessed conventionally and using life table techniques.

settingDistrict health authorities in England.

main outcome measuresLife expectancies in the 105 DHAs in relation to rank, to gender, and to deprivation category based on the census based Jarman score.

conclusionsDifferences in life expectancy had widened over the decade and prosperous areas with greatest longevity had seen the largest gains. In most deprived areas improvements in life expectancy were negligible. The greatest gender differences in life expectancy were also seen in deprived areas.

Indexed as

Life ExpectancyPovertyAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolEnglandFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMortalityResidence CharacteristicsSex FactorsSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID9519128
PMCPMC1060562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.