Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9517371›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1998

Comparison of the effects of nadolol and bisoprolol on noradrenaline-evoked venoconstriction in man in vivo.

A H Abdelmawla, R W Langley, E Szabadi, C M Bradshaw

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A H AbdelmawlaDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.
R W Langley
E Szabadi
C M Bradshaw
Queen's University · CAQueen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIn an attempt to explore the possible involvement of venodilator beta-adrenoceptors in the constrictor response of the human dorsal hand vein to noradrenaline, we examined the ability of nadolol, a non-selective beta1/beta2-adrenoceptor antagonist, and bisoprolol a selective beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist, to potentiate the response.

methodsTwelve healthy male volunteers participated in three weekly sessions. In each session nadolol (40 mg), bisoprolol (5 mg) or placebo was ingested, and (-) noradrenaline acid tartrate (0.33-33.33 ng min ) was infused locally into the dorsal hand vein 2 h after the ingestion of the drugs. Changes in vein diameter were monitored with the dorsal hand vein compliance technique. Subjects were allocated to treatments and sessions according to a double-blind balanced cross-over design. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate were also measured.

resultsNoradrenaline produced dose-dependent venoconstriction which was antagonized by bisoprolol but remained unaffected by nadolol (ANOVA with repeated measures: F(2,22) = 5.07, P < 0.025; Dunnett's test: placebo vs nadolol; t = 0.35, df = 22, k = 3, NS; placebo vs bisoprolol; t = 2.83, df = 22, k = 3, P < 0.01). Mean (+/- s.e. mean) logED50s (ng min[-1]) were 0.44 +/- 0.15 (placebo), 0.73 +/- 0.11 (bisoprolol) and 0.50 +/- 0.21 (nadolol); mean (95% CI) differences were 0.29 (-0.005, 0.58) for placebo vs bisoprolol and 0.06 (-0.35, 0.46) for placebo vs nadolol. Both active drugs significantly (compared with placebo, P < 0.05) decreased (mean change from pretreatment +/- s.e. mean) heart rate (bisoprolol -16.08 +/- 2.01; nadolol -11.67 +/- 2.06) and systolic blood pressure (bisoprolol -15.0 +/- 0.80; nadolol -9.47 +/- 0.18).

conclusionsThe failure of nadolol and bisoprolol to potentiate noradrenaline-evoked venoconstriction argues against the involvement of masked venodilator beta-adrenoceptors in the response. The mechanism underlying the antagonism of noradrenaline-evoked venoconstriction by bisoprolol remains to be elucidated.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultBisoprololBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodHandHeart RateHumansMaleNadololNorepinephrinePlacebosVasoconstrictionAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsBisoprololNadololNorepinephrinePlacebos

Identifiers

PMID9517371
PMCPMC1873373
OpenAlexW1480546807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.