Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9510509›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology1998

Comparative mapping of X chromosomes in vole species of the genus Microtus.

T B Nesterova, S M Duthie, N A Mazurok, A A Isaenko, N V Rubtsova, S M Zakian, N Brockdorff

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Centromere repositioning in the X chromosome of XO/XO mammals, Ryukyu spiny rat.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Article
  7. Attenuated spread of X-inactivation in an X;autosome translocation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  8. X chromosome painting in Microtus: origin and evolution of the giant sex chromosomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2004
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative chromosome and mitochondrial DNA analyses and phylogenetic relationships within common voles (Microtus, Arvicolidae).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2001
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

T B NesterovaMRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
S M Duthie
N A Mazurok
A A Isaenko
N V Rubtsova
S M Zakian
N Brockdorff
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUHammersmith Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative mapping of X-linked genes has progressed rapidly since Ohno's prediction that genes on the X chromosome should be conserved as a syntenic group in all mammals. Although several conserved blocks of homology between human and mouse have been discovered, rearrangements within the X chromosome have also been characterized. More recently, some exceptions to Ohno's law have been reported. We have used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to map five genes, Gla, G6pd, Hprt, Pgk1 and Xist, to two of the largest conserved segments of X material in five members of the genus Microtus (grey vole) and show that vole X chromosomes demonstrate greater homology to human than to mouse. Cytogenetic analysis indicates a relatively high frequency of rearrangement during vole evolution, although certain blocks of homology appear to be highly conserved in all species studied to date. On this basis we were able to predict the probable location of the rat X inactivation centre (Xic) based solely on high-resolution G-banding. Our prediction was then confirmed by mapping the rat Xist gene by FISH. The possible significance of conserving long-range chromosome structure in the vicinity of the Xic is discussed with respect to the mechanism of X inactivation.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingRNA, Untranslatedalpha-GalactosidaseAnimalsArvicolinaeCells, CulturedDNA ProbesDosage Compensation, GeneticEvolution, MolecularFibroblastsGene RearrangementGenetic LinkageGlucosephosphate DehydrogenaseHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMalealpha-GalactosidaseDNA ProbesGlucosephosphate DehydrogenaseHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferasePhosphoglycerate KinaseRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedTranscription FactorsXIST non-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID9510509
OpenAlexW172163848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.