ArticleJournal of medical genetics1998
Scarcity of mutations detected in families with X linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: diagnostic implications.
Article in Journal of medical genetics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mutation identification in a canine model of X-linked ectodermal dysplasia.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2005Article
- A novel X-linked disorder of immune deficiency and hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia is allelic to incontinentia pigmenti and due to mutations in IKK-gamma (NEMO).American journal of human genetics · 2000Article
- Identification of a new splice form of the EDA1 gene permits detection of nearly all X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia mutations.American journal of human genetics · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Indirect molecular diagnosis of X linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED), a congenital disorder of hair, teeth, and eccrine sweat glands, has been possible by linkage analysis. Direct mutation detection would enable carrier detection in female relatives of sporadic cases, as well as help distinguish XLHED from the rarer, clinically indistinguishable, autosomal recessive disorder ARHED. Recently, a candidate gene for XLHED has been identified. Genomic DNA from 162 affected males and 21 females, who were either obligate carriers or had manifestations of the disorder, were screened by SSCP analysis. A subset of the patients had been previously screened for large genomic deletions and had limited screening of a single exon by SSCP analysis. The two known exons were amplified using flanking primers. Approximately 7% of patients, all males, had putative mutations identified within exon 1, but no variants were found within exon 2. Ten different putative mutations and four probable polymorphisms were identified. Both of the known exons were sequenced in 10 patients who had no detectable SSCP changes, but no additional mutations were found. No correlation between phenotype and genotype was evident between either affected subjects or subjects with or without detectable mutations. The results of the study indicate that only a small minority of affected males can be diagnosed by direct mutation analysis, and that the remainder of the patients are likely to have mutations in as yet unidentified exons of the EDA gene. Linkage analysis, in informative situations, therefore remains the only practical diagnostic option available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.