ReviewDrugs1998
Oral antidiabetic agents. A guide to selection.
Review in Drugs, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Appropriate timing of glimepiride administration in patients with type 2 diabetes millitus: a study in Mediterranean countries.Endocrine · 2000Trial
- Relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of metforphin hydrochloride extended-released and immediate-released tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokineticsTrial
- Attenuating effects ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Budget Impact of Introducing Linagliptin into Bosnia and Herzegovina Health Insurance Drug Reimbursement List in 2016-2018.Materia socio-medica · 2017Article
- Drug-drug interactions with sodium-glucose cotransporters type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, new oral glucose-lowering agents for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2014Review
- Safety and efficacy of acarbose in the treatment of diabetes in Chinese patients.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2014Review
- Genetic polymorphisms potentially associated with response to metformin in postmenopausal diabetics suffering and not suffering with cancer.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2013Article
- Protective effect of salidroside from Rhodiolae Radix on diabetes-induced oxidative stress in mice.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2011Article
- Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitors (gliptins): focus on drug-drug interactions.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2010Review
- Drug-drug and food-drug pharmacokinetic interactions with new insulinotropic agents repaglinide and nateglinide.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2007Review
- Pharmacokinetic interactions with thiazolidinediones.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2007Review
- The association between diabetes related medical costs and glycemic control: a retrospective analysis.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2006Article
- Drug Interactions of Clinical Importance with Antihyperglycaemic Agents : An Update.Drug safety · 2005Review
- Review
- Is there a role for alpha-glucosidase inhibitors in the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus?Drugs · 2003Review
- Review
- Hepatotoxicity with thiazolidinediones: is it a class effect?Drug safety · 2001Review
- Review
- Review
- The use of sulphonylureas in the elderly.Drugs & aging · 1999Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (formerly named non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or NIDDM) is a heterogeneous disease resulting from a dynamic interaction between defects in insulin secretion and insulin action. Various pharmacological approaches can be used to improve glucose homeostasis via different modes of action: sulphonylureas essentially stimulate insulin secretion, biguanides (metformin) act by promoting glucose utilisation and reducing hepatic-glucose production, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (acarbose) slow down carbohydrate absorption from the gut and thiazolidinediones (troglitazone) enhance cellular insulin action on glucose and lipid metabolism. These pharmacological treatments may be used individually for certain types of patients, or may be combined in a stepwise fashion to provide more ideal glycaemic control for most patients. Selection of oral antihyperglycaemic agents as first-line drug or combined therapy should be based on both the pharmacological properties of the compounds (efficacy and safety, profile) and the clinical characteristics of the patient (stage of disease, bodyweight, etc.). Mildly hyperglycaemic patients should preferably be treated with metformin, acarbose or thiazolidinediones (which are not associated with any hypoglycaemic risk), while more severely hyperglycaemic individuals should receive a sulphonylurea. In moderately hyperglycaemic patients, sulphonylureas should be preferred in nonobese patients while metformin, and probably also thiazolidinediones, should have priority in obese insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic patients. Acarbose is mainly indicated to reduce post-prandial glucose fluctuations and improve glycaemic stability. Each antihyperglycaemic agent may also be combined with insulin therapy to improve glycaemic control and/or reduce the insulin requirement of diabetic patients after secondary failure to oral treatment. Finally, safety should be taken into account in elderly patients and/or those with renal impairment, especially as far as the use of sulphonylureas (higher risk of hypoglycaemia) and metformin (higher risk of lactic acidosis) is concerned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.