ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience1998
Sensory cells determine afferent terminal morphology in cross-innervated electroreceptor organs: implications for hair cells.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Type I and type II hair cells of the vestibular system are innervated by afferents that form calyceal and bouton terminals, respectively. These cannot be experimentally cross-innervated in the inner ear to determine how they influence each other. However, analogous organs are accessible for transplantation and cross-innervation in the brown ghost electric fish. These fish possess three types of electroreceptor organs. Of these, the sensory receptors of the type I tuberous organ are S-100- and parvalbumin-positive with a calbindin-positive afferent that forms a large calyx around the organ. Neither the sensory receptors nor the afferents of the ampullary organs label with these antibodies, and the afferent branches form a single large bouton beneath each receptor cell. In controls, when cut ampullary afferents reinnervate transplanted ampullary organs, they have characteristic calbindin-negative terminals with large boutons. When type I tuberous afferents reinnervate ampullary organs, receptor cells remain S-100- and parvalbumin-negative, and the tuberous afferents still express calbindin. The nerve terminals, however, make large ampullary-like boutons on the receptor cells. These results suggest that (1) afferent terminal morphology is dictated by the receptor organ; (2) expression of calbindin by the afferent is not suppressed by innervation of the incorrect end organ; (3) ampullary organs generate ampullary receptor cells although innervated by tuberous afferents; and (4) ampullary receptor cells can be trophically supported by tuberous afferents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9502817PMC6793110W1552285855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.