ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1998
Marker selection for the transmission/disequilibrium test, in recently admixed populations.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adjustment for local ancestry in genetic association analysis of admixed populations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011Article
- A classical likelihood based approach for admixture mapping using EM algorithm.Human genetics · 2006Article
- Admixture mapping as a gene discovery approach for complex human traits and diseases.Current hypertension reports · 2005Review
- Linkage analysis of a complex disease through use of admixed populations.American journal of human genetics · 2004Article
- Ethnic-difference markers for use in mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium.American journal of human genetics · 2002Article
- Markers for mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium in African American and Hispanic populations.American journal of human genetics · 2001Article
- The problems of using the transmission/disequilibrium test to infer tight linkage.American journal of human genetics · 2000Article
- Significant admixture linkage disequilibrium across 30 cM around the FY locus in African Americans.American journal of human genetics · 2000Article
- Sibling-based tests of linkage and association for quantitative traits.American journal of human genetics · 1999Article
- Transmission disequilibrium, family controls, and great expectations.American journal of human genetics · 1998Article
- Mapping genes that underlie ethnic differences in disease risk: methods for detecting linkage in admixed populations, by conditioning on parental admixture.American journal of human genetics · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent admixture between genetically differentiated populations can result in high levels of association between alleles at loci that are <=10 cM apart. The transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) proposed by Spielman et al. (1993) can be a powerful test of linkage between disease and marker loci in the presence of association and therefore could be a useful test of linkage in admixed populations. The degree of association between alleles at two loci depends on the differences in allele frequencies, at the two loci, in the founding populations; therefore, the choice of marker is important. For a multiallelic marker, one strategy that may improve the power of the TDT is to group marker alleles within a locus, on the basis of information about the founding populations and the admixed population, thereby collapsing the marker into one with fewer alleles. We have examined the consequences of collapsing a microsatellite into a two-allele marker, when two founding populations are assumed for the admixed population, and have found that if there is random mating in the admixed population, then typically there is a collapsing for which the power of the TDT is greater than that for the original microsatellite marker. A method is presented for finding the optimal collapsing that has minimal dependence on the disease and that uses estimates either of marker allele frequencies in the two founding populations or of marker allele frequencies in the current, admixed population and in one of the founding populations. Furthermore, this optimal collapsing is not always the collapsing with the largest difference in allele frequencies in the founding populations. To demonstrate this strategy, we considered a recent data set, published previously, that provides frequency estimates for 30 microsatellites in 13 populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.