Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9490795›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1998

A liquid chromatography/electrospray mass spectrometric study on the post-transcriptional modification of tRNA.

H Taniguchi, N Hayashi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H TaniguchiDivision of Biomedical Polymer Science, Institute for Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan. htanigut@fjuita-hu.ac.jp
N Hayashi
Fujita Health University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid chromatography/electrospray mass spectrometry is one of the rapidly developing techniques with which mass of large hydrophilic polymers such as proteins and nucleic acids can be determined precisely. The technique was applied to studies on the modifications of tRNAs. Various tRNA species purified from Escherichia coli were directly injected into a capillary reversed-phase column and the desalted and concentrated tRNAs were analyzed on-line with an electrospray mass spectrometer. In some cases, small but significant differences were noted between the theoretical and observed molecular masses, suggesting that there exist still unknown modifications. Under high resolution measurements, multiple peaks corresponding to species modified to a varying extent were resolved. To study the structures in detail, the isolated tRNA species were digested with ribonuclease T1, and the resulting mixture of fragments were analyzed by the same liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. In this way, most of the fragments were easily identified solely from their masses, and the positions where the expected and real structures differ were revealed. The results obtained showed the presence of micro-heterogeneity among tRNAs and demonstrated at the same time the power of the hyphenated technique for the structural analysis on nucleic acids.

Indexed as

RNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalAnticodonBase SequenceChromatography, LiquidEscherichia coliMass SpectrometryMolecular WeightRibonuclease T1RNA, BacterialRNA, FungalRNA, TransferRNA, Transfer, GluRNA, Transfer, LysRNA, Transfer, MetRNA, Transfer, PheSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAnticodonRibonuclease T1RNA, BacterialRNA, FungalRNA, TransferRNA, Transfer, GluRNA, Transfer, LysRNA, Transfer, MetRNA, Transfer, Phe

Identifiers

PMID9490795
PMCPMC147412
OpenAlexW2085286256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.