Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9490734›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1998

Cytoplasmic regulation of the movement of E-cadherin on the free cell surface as studied by optical tweezers and single particle tracking: corralling and tethering by the membrane skeleton.

Y Sako, A Nagafuchi, S Tsukita, M Takeichi, A Kusumi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Mechanics of cell-cell junctions.Biophysical journal · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Engineering the Interactions of Classical Cadherin Cell-Cell Adhesion Proteins.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biophysical Approaches for Applying and Measuring Biological Forces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inside-out regulation of E-cadherin conformation and adhesion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Cadherin puncta are interdigitated dynamic actin protrusions necessary for stable cadherin adhesion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y SakoDepartment of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan.
A Nagafuchi
S Tsukita
M Takeichi
A Kusumi
Nagoya University · JPKyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The translational movement of E-cadherin, a calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion molecule in the plasma membrane in epithelial cells, and the mechanism of its regulation were studied using single particle tracking (SPT) and optical tweezers (OT). The wild type (Wild) and three types of artificial cytoplasmic mutants of E-cadherin were expressed in L-cells, and their movements were compared. Two mutants were E-cadherins that had deletions in the COOH terminus and lost the catenin-binding site(s) in the COOH terminus, with remaining 116 and 21 amino acids in the cytoplasmic domain (versus 152 amino acids for Wild); these are called Catenin-minus and Short-tailed in this paper, respectively. The third mutant, called Fusion, is a fusion protein between E-cadherin without the catenin-binding site and alpha-catenin without its NH2-terminal half. These cadherins were labeled with 40-nm phi colloidal gold or 210-nm phi latex particles via a monoclonal antibody to the extracellular domain of E-cadherin for SPT or OT experiments, respectively. E-cadherin on the dorsal cell surface (outside the cell-cell contact region) was investigated. Catenin-minus and Short-tailed could be dragged an average of 1.1 and 1.8 micron by OT (trapping force of 0.8 pN), and exhibited average microscopic diffusion coefficients (Dmicro) of 1.2 x 10(-10) and 2.1 x 10(-10) cm2/s, respectively. Approximately 40% of Wild, Catenin-minus, and Short-tailed exhibited confined-type diffusion. The confinement area was 0.13 micron2 for Wild and Catenin-minus, while that for Short-tailed was greater by a factor of four. In contrast, Fusion could be dragged an average of only 140 nm by OT. Average Dmicro for Fusion measured by SPT was small (0.2 x 10(-10) cm2/s). These results suggest that Fusion was bound to the cytoskeleton. Wild consists of two populations; about half behaves like Catenin- minus, and the other half behaves like Fusion. It is concluded that the movements of the wild-type E-cadherin in the plasma membrane are regulated via the cytoplasmic domain by (a) tethering to actin filaments through catenin(s) (like Fusion) and (b) a corralling effect of the network of the membrane skeleton (like Catenin-minus). The effective spring constants of the membrane skeleton that contribute to the tethering and corralling effects as measured by the dragging experiments were 30 and 5 pN/micron, respectively, indicating a difference in the skeletal structures that produce these two effects.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportCadherinsCell LineCell MembraneCytochalasinsCytoplasmCytoskeletonDiffusionMiceMicromanipulationMicroscopy, VideoOptics and PhotonicsCadherinsCytochalasins

Identifiers

PMID9490734
PMCPMC2132701
OpenAlexW2015223335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.