ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998
General practitioner's perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 215 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
215 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 896 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Limited Evidence to Fully Determine the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice by Healthcare Providers in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Evidence-Based Practice Competencies among Nutrition Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review.The Journal of nutrition · 2024Pooled it
- Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Evidence-based practice: Knowledge, attitudes, implementation, facilitators, and barriers among community nurses-systematic review.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Epidural analgesia for adults undergoing cardiac surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Postoperative epidural analgesia versus systemic analgesia for thoraco-lumbar spine surgery in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- A real-world approach to Evidence-Based Medicine in general practice: a competency framework derived from a systematic review and Delphi process.BMC medical education · 2017Pooled it
- Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- The use of ultrasound guidance for perioperative neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Improving the uptake of systematic reviews: a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and relevance.BMJ open · 2014Pooled it
- Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures.Implementation science : IS · 2013Pooled it
- Barriers to GPs' use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012Pooled it
- Guideline
- Guidance for commissioners on the cost effectiveness of smoking cessation interventionsThorax · 1998Guideline
- Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: results of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.Implementation science : IS · 2021Trial
- Trial
155 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the attitude of general practitioners towards evidence based medicine and their related educational needs.
designA questionnaire study of general practitioners.
settingGeneral practice in the former Wessex region, England. SUBJECTS: Randomly selected sample of 25% of all general practitioners (452), of whom 302 replied.
main outcome measuresRespondents' attitude towards evidence based medicine, ability to access and interpret evidence, perceived barriers to practising evidence based medicine, and best method of moving from opinion based to evidence based medicine.
resultsRespondents mainly welcomed evidence based medicine and agreed that its practice improves patient care. They had a low level of awareness of extracting journals, review publications, and databases (only 40% knew of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), and, even if aware, many did not use them. In their surgeries 20% had access to bibliographic databases and 17% to the world wide web. Most had some understanding of the technical terms used. The major perceived barrier to practising evidence based medicine was lack of personal time. Respondents thought the most appropriate way to move towards evidence based general practice was by using evidence based guidelines or proposals developed by colleagues.
conclusionPromoting and improving access to summaries of evidence, rather than teaching all general practitioners literature searching and critical appraisal, would be the more appropriate method of encouraging evidence based general practice. General practitioners who are skilled in accessing and interpreting evidence should be encouraged to develop local evidence based guidelines and advice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.