Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9484958›Full record

ArticleCell motility and the cytoskeleton1998

Rapid and efficient purification of actin from nonmuscle sources.

D A Schafer, P B Jennings, J A Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell motility and the cytoskeleton, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Actin and Actin-Binding Proteins.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D A SchaferDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. dorothy@cellbio.wustl.edu
P B Jennings
J A Cooper
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms in Actin Assembly &Cell MotilityR01GM038542 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, JOHN A · 1989 to 2013
$7.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for biochemical quantities of nonmuscle actin has been increased by observations that actin isoform composition of a cell influences the cell's motile and structural properties. In addition, the number of actin binding proteins that exhibit different binding interactions with beta- and gamma-actin compared to alpha-actin from skeletal muscle is growing. We report a procedure designed to purify actin from nonmuscle tissues employing extraction of monomeric actin from tissues with high concentrations of Tris, chromatography on DE-53 cellulose, and affinity chromatography of DNase I-agarose. The preparation is easy to perform and yields quantities of nonmuscle actin sufficient for biochemical and cell biological assays. Actin from bovine erythrocytes and from brains of adult and embryonic chickens was obtained using this method, which can be readily used with other sources of tissue. Coomassie-Blue-stained SDS gels of the purified actin show no contaminants; capping protein, a common contaminant of actin preparations, is absent by immunoblotting. This method for purifying nonmuscle actin will be useful to investigate functional differences in the biology of actin isoforms or their regulating proteins.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsBrainCattleChickensErythrocytesActins

Identifiers

PMID9484958
PMCPMC2362386
OpenAlexW2039495884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.