Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9475350›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical immunology1998

Oral tolerance.

W Strober, B Kelsall, T Marth

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical immunology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Plant-based oral vaccines: results of human trials.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2009
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Are we getting enough allergens?International archives of allergy and immunology · 2008
    Article
  9. Transgenic plants for animal health: plant-made vaccine antigens for animal infectious disease control.Phytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe · 2008
    Article
  10. Enteroendocrine cells express functional Toll-like receptors.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2007
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Peyer's patches are required for oral tolerance to proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2001
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

W StroberMucosal Immunity Section, Laboratory for Clinical Investigation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1890, USA.
B Kelsall
T Marth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral tolerance is the immunologic mechanism by which the mucosal immune system maintains unresponsiveness to the myriad of antigens in the mucosal environment which might otherwise induce untoward immune responses. Recent studies have shown that it is mediated by several distinct, yet interacting mechanisms including the generation of suppressive T cells producing antigen nonspecific cytokines and the induction of clonal deletion and/or anergy. In this review of oral tolerance, we discuss these mechanisms in detail and show how oral tolerance or lack thereof may explain the occurrence of mucosal inflammation. In addition, we discuss how induction of oral tolerance can be used to treat autoimmune states.

Indexed as

HumansImmune ToleranceImmunity, MucosalMouth Mucosa

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.