Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9472636›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer1998

Use of the comet assay for assessment of drug resistance and its modulation in vivo.

P Huang, P L Olive, R E Durand

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P HuangMedical Biophysics Department, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
P L Olive
R E Durand

Funding

MODIFYING XENOGRAFT RADIOSENSITIVITY BY CHEMOTHERAPYR01CA056600 · NCI · BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY · PI DURAND, RALPH E. · 1992 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS CA-56600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug resistance is generally considered to be a major impediment to successful cancer chemotherapy, yet it is generally not possible to predict the degree or timing of the emergence of tumour resistance in most chemotherapy protocols. Recent developments with the single-cell gel electrophoresis or 'comet' assay for DNA damage at the single-cell level suggest that this technique might provide a method for identifying and potentially monitoring tumour cell responsiveness to many anti-cancer agents in situ. In principle, this assay could be applied to any accessible tumour being treated with chemotherapeutic agents that cause overt DNA damage. We have investigated that supposition using several rodent and human tumour cell lines exhibiting a spectrum of resistance to the DNA strand-breaking drug, etoposide. By assessing cells grown as monolayers, spheroids and xenografted tumours in immunodeficient mice, we found that the comet assay can provide not only an index of sensitivity to etoposide, but, additionally, can demonstrate the efficacy (or lack thereof) of multidrug resistance (MDR) reversing agents for cells in vitro, and tumours in vivo.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAnimalsCricetinaeDNA DamageEtoposideHumansMiceNeoplasm TransplantationTransplantation, HeterologousTumor Cells, CulturedEtoposide

Identifiers

PMID9472636
PMCPMC2151301
OpenAlexW2015473824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.