ArticleBritish journal of cancer1998
Effects of p53 mutants derived from lung carcinomas on the p53-responsive element (p53RE) of the MDM2 gene.
Article in British journal of cancer, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating the DNA damage and protein stress responses during cancer development and treatment.The Journal of pathology · 2018Review
- The human oncoprotein MDM2 induces replication stress eliciting early intra-S-phase checkpoint response and inhibition of DNA replication origin firing.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Cdc6 expression represses E-cadherin transcription and activates adjacent replication origins.The Journal of cell biology · 2011Article
- Article
- p53 activates ICAM-1 (CD54) expression in an NF-kappaB-independent manner.The EMBO journal · 2003Article
- Bcl-2/Bax protein ratio predicts 5-fluorouracil sensitivity independently of p53 status.British journal of cancer · 2000Article
- Article
- Alterations of the p16-pRb pathway and the chromosome locus 9p21-22 in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: relationship with p53 and MDM2 protein expression.The American journal of pathology · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study represents a continuation of previous works in which we observed that lung carcinomas co-expressing MDM2 protein and p53 mutants (mt p53) exhibited more aggressive behaviour. In the above studies, we suggested a 'gain of function' mechanism of mt p53 proteins based on the fact that the MDM2 gene possesses a p53-responsive element (MDM2-p53RE). In this study, to prove our hypothesis, we selected 12 cases from a series of 51 bronchogenic carcinomas. In these 12 cases, we examined the ability of the expressed mt p53 to bind the MDM2-p53RE and correlated the findings with MDM2 expression. Furthermore, we constructed four of these p53 mutants and studied their transactivation properties by co-transfecting them with a reporter plasmid carrying MDM2-p53RE in the p53 null non-small-cell lung carcinoma cell line (NSCLC) H1299. We observed mutant p53 protein DNA-binding activity, which depended on the nature and the position of the amino acid substitution. The fact that the cases with DNA-binding activity were accompanied with MDM2 protein isoforms' overexpression is indicative of a 'gain of function' phenotype. This hypothesis was enforced by the findings of the transfection experiments, which revealed that certain p53 mutants enhanced the expression of the luciferase reporter gene either directly or indirectly via a dominant positive effect on the wild-type p53. In conclusion, this work is one first attempt to examine if the deregulation of the p53/MDM2 autoregulatory feedback loop is due to novel properties of certain p53 mutants in the specific environment of a subset of bronchogenic carcinomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.