Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9472505›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998

Factors affecting uptake of antenatal HIV testing in London: results of a multicentre study.

D M Gibb, S E MacDonagh, R Gupta, P A Tookey, C S Peckham, A E Ades

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Reducing vertical transmission of HIV in the UK.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How to assess an article on economic evaluation.Sexually transmitted infections · 1998
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

D M GibbDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Child Health, London. d.gibb@ich.ucl.ac.uk
S E MacDonagh
R Gupta
P A Tookey
C S Peckham
A E Ades
Public Health Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo measure the uptake of antenatal HIV testing and determine its relation to risk of HIV and to screening practices.

designMulticentre prospective questionnaire study. SUBJECTS: Pregnant women attending six maternity units.

settingInner London, 1995-6.

main outcome measuresUptake of testing by risk factors for HIV, ethnicity, and factors about the antenatal interview.

resultsAll units had a "universal offer" policy for HIV testing. In five units forms were completed for 18,791 (88%) of 21,247 pregnant women. The sixth unit, where the response rate was too low to assess uptake, was excluded from the analysis. Uptake ranged from 3.4% to 51.2% (overall 22.9%), in parallel with detection of previously undiagnosed infection in pregnant women (4.9-60%). Controlling for unit, uptake was higher among the 7% who disclosed risk factors. Among those at low risk, uptake varied by ethnic group (South Asian women 9%; Latin American and Mediterranean women 33%). The relation between uptake and HIV risk category varied greatly across units. Despite increased HIV seroprevalence in black African women, uptake was similar in this group to that among women at low risk (24%). Uptake increased 2.1-fold if HIV transmission was discussed. Midwives reported spending 7 (2-15) minutes discussing HIV issues.

conclusionsUptake of HIV testing was unacceptably low in all units, with maternity unit the strongest predictor. New approaches to antenatal HIV testing are urgently required and uptake should be audited routinely.

Indexed as

AfricaCounselingFemaleHealth Care SurveysHIV InfectionsHumansInfant, NewbornLondonPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSexual PartnersUrban Health

Identifiers

PMID9472505
PMCPMC2665481
OpenAlexW2122968890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.