ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998
Epidemiology and detection of HIV-1 among pregnant women in the United Kingdom: results from national surveillance 1988-96.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Routine antenatal HIV testing and informed consent: an unworkable marriage?Journal of medical ethics · 2007Article
- Estimating adult HIV prevalence in the UK in 2003: the direct method of estimation.Sexually transmitted infections · 2006Article
- Treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections during pregnancy.American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2003Review
- Pneumonia and pregnancy.Thorax · 2001Review
- Active surveillance of hepatitis C infection in the UK and Ireland.Archives of disease in childhood · 2000Article
- The ethics of anonymized HIV testing of pregnant women: a reappraisal.Journal of medical ethics · 2000Review
- Vertical transmission rates for HIV in the British Isles: estimates based on surveillance data.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
- Trends in undiagnosed HIV-1 infection among attenders at genitourinary medicine clinics, England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: 1990-6.Sexually transmitted infections · 1999Article
- The use of the dried blood spot sample in epidemiological studies.Journal of clinical pathology · 1999Review
- General practice and the care of children with HIV infection: 6 month prospective interview study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
- Universal HIV screening of pregnant women in England: cost effectiveness analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
- Antenatal HIV testing: assessment of a routine voluntary approach.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
- Reducing the vertical transmission of HIV. Women should be tested at time of abortion.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1998Article
- How to assess an article on economic evaluation.Sexually transmitted infections · 1998Review
- Health status and access to health care of migrant workers in China.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the epidemiology of HIV-1 infection in pregnant women in the United Kingdom.
designSerial unlinked serosurveillance for HIV-1 in neonatal specimens and surveillance through registers of diagnosed maternal and paediatric infections from reporting by obstetricians, paediatricians, and microbiologists.
settingUnited Kingdom, 1988-96. SUBJECTS: Pregnant women proceeding to live births and their children.
main outcome measuresTime trends in prevalence of HIV-1 seropositivity in newborn infants (as a proxy for infection in mothers); the proportions of mothers with diagnosed HIV-1 infections, and their characteristics.
resultsHIV-1 prevalence among mothers in London rose sixfold between 1988 and 1996 (0.19% of women tested; 1 in 520 in 1996). Apart from in Edinburgh and Dundee, levels remained low in Scotland (0.025%; 1 in 3970) and elsewhere in the United Kingdom (0.016%; 1 in 1930). Over a third of births to infected mothers in 1996 occurred outside London. In London the reported infections were predominantly among black African women, whereas in Scotland most were associated with drug injecting. The contribution of reported infection among African women increased over time as that of drug injecting declined. In Scotland 51% of mothers' infections were diagnosed before the birth. In England, despite a national policy initiative in 1992 to increase the antenatal detection rate of HIV, no improvement in detection was observed, and in 1996 only 15% of previously unrecognised HIV infections were diagnosed during pregnancy.
conclusionsHIV-1 infection affects mothers throughout the United Kingdom but is most common in London. Levels of diagnosis in pregnant women have not improved. Surveillance data can monitor effectively the impact of initiatives to reduce preventable HIV-1 infections in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.