Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9466752›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1998

Nosocomial Candida glabrata colonization: an epidemiologic study.

J A Vazquez, L M Dembry, V Sanchez, M A Vazquez, J D Sobel, C Dmuchowski, M J Zervos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Novel Transdermal Application for Clearing Skin Colonization byAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  4. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Efficacy of Ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) against Candida auris in anAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  8. Environmental Contamination withPathogens & immunity · 2019
    Article
  9. Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. First hospital outbreak of the globally emergingAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2016
    Article
  12. Candida glabrata: a review of its features and resistance.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for invasive candidiasis in adults.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2010
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J A VazquezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, and Veterans Administration Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA. JVAZQUEZ@oncgate.roc.wayne.edu
L M Dembry
V Sanchez
M A Vazquez
J D Sobel
C Dmuchowski
M J Zervos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida glabrata has emerged as an important nosocomial pathogen, yet little is known about its epidemiology. We prospectively followed 98 patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit and the bone marrow transplant unit of a university hospital. Samples from environmental surfaces and the hands of hospital personnel were also cultured. Patients with newly acquired C. glabrata strains were compared to controls who were culture negative for C. glabrata. C. glabrata was recovered from multiple sites from 24 patients and three environmental surfaces. Sixteen patients (17%) acquired C. glabrata after admission to the study units. Significant risk factors for the nosocomial acquisition of C. glabrata were prolonged duration of hospitalization in the unit and prior antimicrobial use. Strain delineation by restriction enzyme analysis revealed 28 different strains of C. glabrata; three strain types were common to nine patients. The environmental isolates were of the same strain type and common to five patients (four patients with newly acquired strains). These results suggest the possibility of exogenous nosocomial acquisition of C. glabrata, including the possible acquisition from the hospital environment. Transmission may be by indirect contact since identical strains of C. glabrata were recovered from patients who were geographically and temporally associated.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBone Marrow TransplantationCandidaCandidiasisChildChild, PreschoolCross InfectionDNA, FungalEnvironmental MicrobiologyFemaleHandHealth PersonnelHospitalizationHospitals, UniversityHumansDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID9466752
PMCPMC104553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.