Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9458171›Full record

ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)1998

Extracerebral biopsy in lysosomal and peroxisomal disorders. Ultrastructural findings.

C Ceuterick-de Groote, J J Martin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Submandibular gland biopsy for the diagnosis of Parkinson disease.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Ceuterick-de GrooteLaboratory of Neuropathology, Born-Bunge Foundation and University of Antwerp (UIA), Belgium.
J J Martin
University of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lysosomal and peroxisomal disorders are characterized by specific storage affecting mainly the central nervous system with involvement of the peripheral nervous system and visceral organs. Most of these disorders can now be diagnosed by using biochemical and enzymatical assays and by molecular biology techniques, without the need for a brain biopsy used previously. Extraneural tissue biopsies have also been investigated at the ultrastructural level. The study of such tissues is still necessary when the enzymatic or biochemical defect remains unknown and when DNA studies are not informative. The choice of tissue is important. Skin and conjunctival biopsies are less traumatic and are cost-effective diagnostic tools allowing the examination of a great diversity of structures. Skeletal muscle and peripheral nerves are more frequently used for patients with a late-onset or slower course of disease. Rectal biopsy is helpful when neurons require examination in lysosomal diseases, whereas liver is more usually investigated than adrenal or testis in peroxisomal diseases. Bone marrow is most useful for Gaucher's disease while lymphocytes may be examined for all lysosomal disorders as a first diagnostic approach. Chorionic villi still have a diagnostic role in combination of electron microscopy with DNA studies in early pregnancies at-risk for neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Cultured fibroblasts are less informative than other biopsy samples for the morphological evaluation of lysosomal and peroxisomal disorders.

Indexed as

BiopsyHumansLymphocytesLysosomal Storage DiseasesMicroscopy, ElectronMuscle, SkeletalNervous System DiseasesPeroxisomal DisordersSkin

Identifiers

PMID9458171
PMCPMC8098575
OpenAlexW2015982163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.