ArticleInfection and immunity1998
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in Staphylococcus aureus-induced arthritis.
Article in Infection and immunity, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the role of bacterial virulence factors and host elements in septic arthritis: insights from animal models for innovative therapies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Effects of small intestinal submucosa (SIS) on the murine innate immune microenvironment induced by heat-killed Staphylococcus aureus.PloS one · 2012Article
- Acute septic arthritis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a cytokine that is able to increase not only the production of phagocytic cells but also their efficacy with respect to, e.g., bactericidal properties. In this study, we wanted to analyze the impact of GM-CSF on experimental Staphylococcus aureus-induced arthritis. For that purpose, mice were administered GM-CSF before and after bacterial inoculation. Although there was an increase in the total number of leukocytes as well as in the granulocyte fraction, there was no favorable effect on the severity of arthritis or on survival rates. There were no obvious differences between the GM-CSF-pretreated animals and controls with regard to growth of staphylococci in joints and kidneys 4 days after the bacterial inoculation. In contrast, mice that had been pretreated with GM-CSF prior to bacterial inoculation showed approximately four times lower numbers of bacteria in their blood 24 h later. These results, along with those of our previous studies, suggest that on the one hand the granulocyte is the main protective cell during the course of S. aureus infection but that on the other hand, upregulation of granulocyte-macrophage production will not exert any additional protective effects with respect to tissue injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.