Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9453605›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity1998

Analysis of the Yersinia pestis V protein for the presence of linear antibody epitopes.

J K Pullen, G W Anderson, S L Welkos, A M Friedlander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Metallacarborane Derivatives Effective againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Vaccines · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Amino acid and structural variability of Yersinia pestis LcrV protein.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2010
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J K PullenBacteriology Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland 21702-5011, USA.
G W Anderson
S L Welkos
A M Friedlander

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The V protein expressed by pathogenic Yersinia pestis is an important virulence factor and protective immunogen. The presence of linear B-cell epitopes in the V protein was investigated by using a series of 17 overlapping linear peptides. Groups of 10 mice were immunized intraperitoneally with 30 microg of each peptide on days 0, 30, and 60. Although the V protein-specific antibody response to the peptides varied, most of the peptides elicited high antibody titers. The immunized mice were challenged subcutaneously with 60 50% lethal doses (LD50) (1 LD50 = 1.9 CFU) of a virulent Y. pestis strain, CO92. None of the peptide-immunized mice survived challenge. The animals immunized with the V protein were completely protected against challenge. The immunogenicity of some of the V peptides was increased by conjugating them to keyhole limpet hemocyanin. Only one peptide (encompassing amino acids 1 to 30) conjugate demonstrated some protection; the others were not protective. In additional experiments, V peptides that reacted well with sera from mice surviving Y. pestis infection were combined and used to immunize mice. Although the combined peptides appeared to be very immunogenic, they were not protective. Therefore, the protective B-lymphocyte epitope(s) in the V protein is most likely to be conformational.

Indexed as

Epitope MappingAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBacterial ProteinsB-LymphocytesFemaleImmunizationMiceMolecular Sequence DataYersinia pestisBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID9453605
PMCPMC107937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.