Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9449350›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1998

Determining force dependence of two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding affinity by centrifugation.

J W Piper, R A Swerlick, C Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modeling of spatiotemporal dynamics of ligand-coated particle flow in targeted drug delivery processes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Micropipette-based biomechanical nanotools on living cells.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hydrodynamics in Cell Studies.Chemical reviews · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Particle shape enhances specificity of antibody-displaying nanoparticles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Rapid tumoritropic accumulation of systemically injected plateloid particles and their biodistribution.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J W PiperGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta 30322, USA.
R A Swerlick
C Zhu

Funding

Research Training Program Plan on Cell and Tissue Engineering (CTEng)T32GM008433 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 1991 to 2021
$7.1M
LIGAND BONDING FORCE AND CELL ADHESION BY CD16 ISOFORMSR29AI038282 · NIAID · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ZHU, CHENG · 1995 to 1999
–
NIAID NIH HHS R29AI38282NIGMS NIH HHS GM08433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyses of receptor-ligand interactions are important to the understanding of cellular adhesion. Traditional methods of measuring the three-dimensional (3D) dissociation constant (Kd) require at least one of the molecular species in solution and hence cannot be directly applied to the case of cell adhesion. We describe a novel method of measuring 2D binding characteristics of receptors and ligands that are attached to surfaces and whose bonds are subjected to forces. The method utilizes a common centrifugation assay to quantify adhesion. A model for the experiment has been formulated, solved exactly, and tested carefully. The model is stochastically based and couples the bond force to the binding affinity. The method was applied to examine tumor cell adherence to recombinant E-selectin. Satisfactory agreement was found between predictions and data. The estimated zero-force 2D Kd for E-selectin/carbohydrate ligand binding was approximately 5 x 10(3) microm(-2), and the bond interaction range was subangstrom. Our results also suggest that the number of bonds mediating adhesion was small (<5).

Indexed as

LigandsModels, BiologicalCell AdhesionCentrifugationColonic NeoplasmsE-SelectinHL-60 CellsHumansKineticsMathematicsProbabilityProtein BindingReceptors, Cell SurfaceRegression AnalysisTumor Cells, CulturedE-SelectinLigandsReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID9449350
PMCPMC1299402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.