ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1998
Neural components of topographical representation.
Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrosplenial cortex codes for permanent landmarks.PloS one · 2012Trial
- An experiment of nature: brain anatomy parallels cognition and behavior in Williams syndrome.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2004Trial
- Neural correlates of encoding space from route and survey perspectives.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2002Trial
- Review
- Belief inference for hierarchical hidden states in spatial navigation.Communications biology · 2024Article
- The brain dynamics of architectural affordances during transition.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Possibility of Using Quantitative Assessment with the Cube Copying Test for Evaluation of Visuo-spatial Function in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2021Article
- Spatial navigation and dual-task performance in patients with Dementia that present partial dependence in instrumental activity of daily living.IBRO reports · 2020Article
- Universal Mechanisms and the Development of the Face Network: What You See Is What You Get.Annual review of vision science · 2019Review
- The Neurocognitive Basis of Spatial Reorientation.Current biology : CB · 2018Review
- Retinotopic Organization of Scene Areas in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Functional correlates of likelihood and prior representations in a virtual distance task.Human brain mapping · 2016Article
- Hippocampal 5-HT1A Receptor and Spatial Learning and Memory.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2015Review
- Diagnostic performance on briefly presented digital pathology images.Journal of pathology informatics · 2015Article
- Hemispheric lateralization interrupted: material-specific memory deficits in temporal lobe epilepsy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013Review
- Distinct familiarity-based response patterns for faces and buildings in perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013Article
- Evolution of consciousness: phylogeny, ontogeny, and emergence from general anesthesia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Bottom-up Retinotopic Organization Supports Top-down Mental Imagery.The open neuroimaging journal · 2013Article
- Piecing it together: infants' neural responses to face and object structure.Journal of vision · 2012Article
- A Virtual Radial Arm Maze for the Study of Multiple Memory Systems in a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Environment.The international journal of virtual reality : a multimedia publication for professionals · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of patients with focal brain damage suggest that topographical representation is subserved by dissociable neural subcomponents. This article offers a condensed review of the literature of "topographical disorientation" and describes several functional MRI studies designed to test hypotheses generated by that review. Three hypotheses are considered: (i) The parahippocampal cortex is critically involved in the acquisition of exocentric spatial information in humans; (ii) separable, posterior, dorsal, and ventral cortical regions subserve the perception and long term representation of position and identity, respectively, of landmarks; and (iii) there is a distinct area of the ventral occipitotemporal cortex that responds maximally to building stimuli and may play a role in the perception of salient landmarks. We conclude with a discussion of the inferential limitations of neuroimaging and lesion studies. It is proposed that combining these two approaches allows for inferences regarding the computational involvement of a neuroanatomical substrate in a given cognitive process although neither method can strictly support this conclusion alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.