ReviewUrological research1997
Clinical usefulness of RT-PCR detection of hematogenous prostate cancer spread.
Review in Urological research, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limitations of CD44v6 amplification for the detection of tumour cells in the blood of colorectal cancer patients.British journal of cancer · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understaging is commonly associated with therapeutic failure of surgical intervention in apparently localized prostate cancers. Methods that specifically detect prostate cancer cells in the circulation may be able to identify metastatic cancers and thus aid in the selection of the most adequate therapy. The high sensitivity and specificity of the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) encouraged various groups to investigate the mRNA expression of prostate-specific markers in the peripheral blood of patients with prostate cancer. However, probably due to methodological differences, many contradictory results have been obtained with the markers studied so far: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSM). For this reason, clinical decisions should not be based yet on RT-PCR results. Future research and long-term follow-up on the patients may point out whether RT-PCR assays, following appropriate standardization, will have an additive value in prostate cancer staging and in prediction of tumor progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.