Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9437862›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell1997

Stable transformation of an Arabidopsis cell suspension culture with firefly luciferase providing a cellular system for analysis of chaperone activity in vivo.

C Forreiter, M Kirschner, L Nover

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Seasonal Growth ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Approaches to engineer stability of beetle luciferases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2012
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C ForreiterDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. forreiter@cellbiology.uni-frankfurt.de
M Kirschner
L Nover
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using Agrobacterium, we developed a method to transform an Arabidopsis cell suspension culture. A stably transformed cell line expressing high levels of firefly luciferase (Luc) was used for in vivo studies of thermal denaturation and renaturation of the enzyme and the protective role of different chaperones. Luc activity was monitored under heat stress and recovery conditions in control, thermotolerant cells and cells expressing plant chaperones after transient cotransformation with plasmids encoding proteins of the heat shock protein Hsp90, Hsp70, or Hsp20 family. The effects of the expressed proteins were specific. The Hsp17.6 class I protein maintained Luc activity on a level comparable with that observed in thermotolerant cells and improved Luc renaturation. Although transient expression of Hsp90 did not protect Luc from thermal denaturation, it accelerated Luc renaturation during recovery. In contrast to the other chaperones tested, overexpression of Hsp70 alone had no effect on denaturation and renaturation of Luc but enhanced Luc renaturation if coexpressed with Hsp17.6.

Indexed as

Transformation, GeneticAnimalsArabidopsisCell LineColeopteraEnzyme ActivationGene ExpressionHeat-Shock ProteinsLuciferasesMolecular ChaperonesProtein DenaturationRhizobiumTemperatureHeat-Shock ProteinsLuciferasesMolecular Chaperones

Identifiers

PMID9437862
PMCPMC157066
OpenAlexW2112383686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.