Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics1997
Pharmacokinetics of grepafloxacin after oral administration of single and repeat doses in healthy young males.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple-dose safety and pharmacokinetics of oral garenoxacin in healthy subjects.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2003Trial
- Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of moxifloxacin, a novel 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone, after repeated oral administration.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2001Trial
- Efficacy and safety of a 10-day course of 400 or 600 milligrams of grepafloxacin once daily for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: comparison with a 10-day course of 500 milligrams of ciprofloxacin twice daily.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 1998Trial
- Grepafloxacin pharmacokinetics in individuals with hepatic dysfunction.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1997Trial
- Theophylline and warfarin interaction studies with grepafloxacin.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1997Trial
- Effect of food and gastric pH on the bioavailability of grepafloxacin.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1997Trial
- Antistaphylococcal effect related to the area under the curve/MIC ratio in an in vitro dynamic model: predicted breakpoints versus clinically achievable values for seven fluoroquinolones.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2005Article
- Review
- Commonly used antibacterial and antifungal agents for hospitalised paediatric patients: implications for therapy with an emphasis on clinical pharmacokinetics.Paediatric drugs · 2001Review
- Postantibiotic effects of grepafloxacin compared to those of five other agents against 12 gram-positive and -negative bacteria.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2000Article
- Effects of liver disease on pharmacokinetics. An update.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1999Review
- The new fluoroquinolones: A critical review.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses · 1999Article
- Review
- In vitro activity of grepafloxacin against Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1998Article
- Effect of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of grepafloxacin.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1997Article
- Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of grepafloxacin.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics of grepafloxacin in healthy male subjects following single oral administration of doses ranging from 200 to 1200 mg, and following repeated oral administration of 400 and 800 mg doses are reported. Plasma levels of grepafloxacin reached a peak within 2 hours (on average) following drug administration and then declined bi-exponentially with concentrations being detectable (> 5 micrograms/L) in the plasma for at least up to 72 hours postdose. The high values for the apparent volume of distribution (5 to 8 L/kg) suggested extensive distribution of grepafloxacin in the tissues. Only a small percentage of the administered dose (ranging from 6% to 9.5%) was recovered in the urine as unchanged grepafloxacin, suggesting that metabolism, rather than urinary excretion, is the major elimination route. The half-life of grepafloxacin was about 12 hours after single doses and about 15 hours after repeat doses. The trough levels increased significantly over the first 3 days of repeat administration; thereafter, the changes were small, with steady-state being reached by the fifth day. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24 h) values observed on days 7 and 14 of repeat administration, at each dose level, were similar, suggesting that steady-state is maintained. The area values increased more than proportionally after administration of increasing single and repeat doses, suggesting nonlinear kinetics. The elimination half-life and renal clearance did not change with increasing doses. Saturation in the metabolism of grepafloxacin and possibly in the distribution into a peripheral compartment, as suggested by a decrease in the total plasma clearance and in the apparent volume of distribution, could be the origin of the nonlinear kinetics. However, this deviation from linearity is unlikely to be of clinical significance, since it was very small over the recommended range of therapeutic doses (400 to 600 mg once daily). Compared with other quinolones, grepafloxacin showed the longest half-life and the highest apparent volume of distribution. These features, together with the excellent bactericidal activity of grepafloxacin, support the recommended dosage regimen of grepafloxacin for the treatment of respiratory tract infections and sexually transmitted diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.