Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9429014›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of sports medicine1997

Comparison of lung volume in Greek swimmers, land based athletes, and sedentary controls using allometric scaling.

M Doherty, L Dimitriou

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of sports medicine, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Pulmonary adaptations to swim and inspiratory muscle training.European journal of applied physiology · 2008
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Explainable Machine Learning Models for Predicting FEVDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Lung Function Changes with Swim Training in Healthy and Allergic Endurance Athletes.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Exhaled Breath Analysis: From Laboratory Test to Wearable Sensing.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Puzzle of Marijuana Use and Forced Vital Capacity.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Determinants of lung function changes in athletic swimmers. A review.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2022
    Review
  17. Prevalence of Asthma among Norwegian Elite Athletes.Translational sports medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M DohertyDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Luton, United Kingdom.
L Dimitriou
English Institute of Sport · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare lung volumes in a large cross sectional sample of Greek swimmers, land based athletes, and sedentary controls by means of allometric scaling.

methodsFour hundred and fifty nine asymptomatic Greek children and young adults (age 10-21 years), including 159 swimmers, 130 land based athletes, and 170 sedentary controls, performed forced expiratory manoeuvres into a portable spirometer. Measurements included forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1.0), and peak expiratory flow. Body mass and stature were also measured using standardised anthropometric techniques.

resultsLogarithmic transformations showed that in FEV1.0 was highly related to in stature in males and females (r = 0.93 and 0.86 respectively, P < 0.001) and were used to determine the exponent in an allometric equation which also included age and age. Resulting power functions, FEV1.0/stature, were 0.64 (0.18) litres/m2.69 and 0.33 (0.24) litres/m2.32 for males and females respectively (mean (SE)). The male and female swimming groups had larger FEV1.0 than both land based athletes and sedentary controls (one way analysis of variance, P < 0.001). In addition, male national standard swimmers (n = 38) had superior FEV1.0 in comparison with male non-national standard swimmers (n = 24; t test, P < 0.05). However, when years of swimming training was controlled for by analysis of covariance, the difference in FEV1.0 between the two groups was no longer evident.

conclusionsSwimmers have superior FEV1.0 independent of stature and age in comparison with both land based athletes and sedentary controls. In addition, male national standard swimmers have superior FEV1.0 independent of stature and age in comparison with male non-national standard swimmers. When years of training is controlled for, the difference in FEV1.0 between the two groups is no longer evident. This suggests that the years of swimming training and/or the earlier age at which training begins may have a significant influence on subsequent FEV1.0 and swimming performance. However, because of the cross sectional nature of this study, the results do not exclude genetic endowment as a major determinant of the superior lung volume observed in swimmers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsAnalysis of VarianceChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeGreeceHumansMaleModels, BiologicalPhysical Education and TrainingPhysical EndurancePhysical FitnessReference Values

Identifiers

PMID9429014
PMCPMC1332573
OpenAlexW2112998024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.