ReviewFrontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library1998
Alzheimer's disease and brain development: common molecular pathways.
Review in Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Location, location, location: altered transcription factor trafficking in neurodegeneration.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2007Review
- Response of cell cycle proteins to neurotrophic factor and chemokine stimulation in human neuroglia.Experimental neurology · 2001Article
- Induction of cell-cycle regulators in simian immunodeficiency virus encephalitis.The American journal of pathology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Research on the causes and treatments of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has led investigators down numerous avenues. Although many models have been proposed, no single model of AD satisfactorily accounts for all neuropathologic findings as well as the requirement of aging for disease onset. The mechanisms of disease progression are equally unclear. We hypothesize that alternative gene expression during AD plays a critical role in disease progression. Numerous developmentally regulated genes and cell cycle proteins have been shown to be re-expressed or activated during AD. These proteins include transcription factors, members of the cell cycle regulatory machinery, and programmed cell death genes. Such proteins play an important role during brain development and would likely exert powerful effects if re-expressed in the adult brain. We propose that the re-expression or activation of developmentally regulated genes define molecular mechanisms active both during brain development and in AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.