ArticleCell proliferation1997
Uncoupling of the order of the S and M phases: effects of staurosporine on human cell cycle kinases.
Article in Cell proliferation, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Counteraction of pRb-dependent protection after extreme hypoxia by elevated ribonucleotide reductase.Cell proliferation · 2004Article
- Effect of staurosporine on cycle of human gastric cancer cells.World journal of gastroenterology · 2004Article
- Hypoxia-induced irreversible S-phase arrest involves down-regulation of cyclin A.Cell proliferation · 2003Article
- Coupling the cell cycle to cell growth.EMBO reports · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The protein kinase inhibitor staurosporine (SSP) was employed to study the involvement of kinases in human cell cycle progression. Thirty to 100 ng/ml SSP blocks entry into S phase and M phase. Lack of entry into S phase is due to impaired activity of the retinoblastoma protein kinase. The requirement for any of the SSP-sensitive kinases for cell cycle progression can be abrogated in tumour cells. Therefore, these kinases act in a checkpoint network negatively controlling the initiation of S phase, M phase and cytokinesis, rather than being inherent parts of a substrate-product chain required for the initiation of the cell cycle phases. As a consequence of the lack of certain checkpoint effectors, tumour cells may endoreduplicate or binucleate in the presence of SSP. The latter processes, as well as meiosis, are naturally occurring in specialized cell types, leading to the idea that this checkpoint network controls the order of the cell cycle phases in normal cells. A model is presented where the cell cycle is envisioned as two independently running cycles, the S and the M cycle, which are controlled by intra and intercycledependent checkpoints in human somatic cells. The model accounts for the dependency of S and M phase initiation on the successful completion of the previous M and S phase, respectively, as well as entry into a resting state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9420612PMC7081159W2006812389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.