Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9414976›Full record

ArticleGut1997

Do patients with irritable bowel syndrome in primary care really differ from outpatients with irritable bowel syndrome?

H E van der Horst, A M van Dulmen, F G Schellevis, J T van Eijk, J F Fennis, G Bleijenberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New treatments for irritable bowel syndrome in women.Women's health (London, England) · 2008
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Symptom interpretation and quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
  12. Irritable bowel syndrome: management of expectations and disease.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Article
  13. Management of irritable bowel syndrome.Postgraduate medical journal · 2003
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Patients with irritable bowel syndrome: health status and use of health care services.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
    Article
  16. Combined urinary and faecal incontinence.International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H E van der HorstDepartment of General Practice, Nursing Home and Social Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A M van Dulmen
F G Schellevis
J T van Eijk
J F Fennis
G Bleijenberg
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the comparability of outpatients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and patients with IBS in primary care with regard to severity of complaints, perceived limitations, other aspects of the complaints, and sex differences.

aimsTo compare outpatients with IBS with primary care patients with IBS. PATIENTS: One hundred and nine patients with IBS were recruited from general practices in Amsterdam and 86 patients with IBS were recruited from the outpatient clinic of the Department of Internal Medicine of the University Hospital in Nijmegen.

methodsEach patient completed a questionnaire on demographic variables, abdominal complaints, related complaints, and attributed causes of their abdominal complaints. The scores of the two groups were compared by univariate and multivariate analysis.

resultsThe outpatient group contained significantly more men, reported more severe abdominal pain, more frequent complaints, more interference with daily activities, and a higher degree of avoidance of activities (p < 0.01) than the primary care group. When each sex was analysed separately, these differences remained for female (p < 0.01) but not for male patients. Outpatients were more likely to attribute their complaints to somatic causes (p < 0.01), whereas primary care patients were more likely to attribute their complaints to stress (p < 0.01) or their agitated way of life (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that a high severity score, a large number of additional complaints, and a low score on the stress attribution were important determinants for being in the outpatient group.

conclusionsFemale outpatients consider their complaints to be more serious and interfering than do patients with IBS in primary care. Male outpatients were comparable to primary care patients with IBS. More research needs to be done into sex specific differences in IBS and into the factors that influence the decision to refer a patient with IBS.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareFamily PracticeSickness Impact ProfileAbdominal PainAdolescentAdultAgedColonic Diseases, FunctionalFemaleHeartburnHumansIntestinal DiseasesLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID9414976
PMCPMC1891570
OpenAlexW2107037202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.