ArticleJapanese journal of cancer research : Gann1997
MIB1-determined proliferative activity in intraductal components and prognosis of invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
Article in Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraductal components of breast carcinoma may have prognostic significance. In this study, we divided 181 invasive ductal breast carcinomas into comedo and non-comedo groups based on intraductal component morphology, and differences between the two groups in clinicopathological variables, including proliferative activity and survival, were assessed. Proliferative activity was evaluated by using MIB1 antibody, which reacts with the cell-proliferation-associated Ki-67 antigen, and was expressed as the number of MIB1-positive nuclei per 1000 cancer cells in intraductal components (MIB1 labeling index). We also investigated which variables had an impact on survival. The comedo group showed a significantly higher MIB1 labeling index than the non-comedo group (P < 0.0001). The differences in disease-free and overall survival between the two groups were not significant (P = 0.2477, P = 0.2069). Multivariate analysis of the entire series showed the MIB1 labeling index to be an independent prognostic factor predicting both disease-free survival and overall survival (P = 0.0160, P = 0.0035). When multivariate analysis was repeated separately for the non-comedo and comedo groups, the MIB1 labeling index remained the most important variable predicting disease-free and overall survival in the non-comedo group (P = 0.0122, P = 0.0040). Moreover, non-comedo patients with a high MIB1 labeling index had significantly shorter disease-free and overall survival than those with a low MIB1 labeling index (P = 0.0040, P = 0.0402). These findings imply that MIB1-determined proliferative activity of intraductal components is an independent predictor of survival, and is the most important predictor in non-comedo cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.