Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9409852›Full record

ArticleGenetics1997

Alu evolution in human populations: using the coalescent to estimate effective population size.

S T Sherry, H C Harpending, M A Batzer, M Stoneking

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Regulatory activity is the default DNA state in eukaryotes.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mobile elements reveal small population size in the ancient ancestors of Homo sapiens.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Estimating translational selection in eukaryotic genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sequence variations in the public human genome data reflect a bottlenecked population history.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S T SherryDepartment of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA. ssherr@lsumc.edu
H C Harpending
M A Batzer
M Stoneking

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are estimated to be approximately 1000 members of the Ya5 Alu subfamily of retroposons in humans. This subfamily has a distribution restricted to humans, with a few copies in gorillas and chimpanzees. Fifty-seven Ya5 elements were previously cloned from a HeLa-derived randomly sheared total genomic library, sequenced, and screened for polymorphism in a panel of 120 unrelated humans. Forty-four of the 57 cloned Alu repeats were monomorphic in the sample and 13 Alu repeats were dimorphic for insertion presence/absence. The observed distribution of sample frequencies of the 13 dimorphic elements is consistent with the theoretical expectation for elements ascertained in a single diploid cell line. Coalescence theory is used to compute expected total pedigree branch lengths for monomorphic and dimorphic elements, leading to an estimate of human effective population size of approximately 18,000 during the last one to two million years.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPopulation DensityRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidRetroelementsGene FrequencyHeLa CellsHumansMultigene FamilyRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID9409852
PMCPMC1208362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.