Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9409476›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology1997

Ca2+ current and Ca(2+)-activated chloride current in isolated smooth muscle cells of the sheep urethra.

K D Cotton, M A Hollywood, N G McHale, K D Thornbury

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What do we really know about the external urethral sphincter?Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  2. CaPhysiological reports · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Functional comparison of anoctamin 1 antagonists on human uterine smooth muscle contractility and excitability.Journal of smooth muscle research = Nihon Heikatsukin Gakkai kikanshi · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Ion channels of the mammalian urethra.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K D CottonDepartment of Physiology, School of Biomedical Science, Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
M A Hollywood
N G McHale
K D Thornbury
Queen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. Isolated sheep urethral cells were studied using the perforated patch clamp technique (T = 37 degrees C). Depolarizing steps ranging from -40 to -10 mV evoked an inward current that peaked within 10 ms and a slower inward current. Stepping back to the holding potential of -80 mV evoked large inward tail currents. All three currents were abolished by nifedipine (1 microM). Substitution of external Ca2+ with Ba2+ resulted in potentiation of the fast inward current and blockade of the slow current and tails. 2. Changing the chloride equilibrium potential (ECl) from 0 to +27 mV shifted the reversal potential of the tail currents from 1 +/- 1 to 27 +/- 1 mV (number of cells, n = 5). Chloride channel blockers, niflumic acid (10 microM) and anthracene-9-carboxylic acid (9AC, 1 mM), reduced the slow current and tails suggesting that these were Ca(2+)-activated Cl- currents, ICl(Ca). 4. Caffeine (10 mM) induced currents that reversed at ECl and were blocked by niflumic acid (10 microM). 5. In current clamp mode, some cells developed spontaneous transient depolarizations (STDs) and action potentials. Short exposure to nifedipine blocked the action potentials and unmasked STDs. In contrast, 9AC and niflumic acid reduced the amplitude of the STDs and blocked the action potentials. 6. In conclusion, these cells have both L-type ICa and ICl(Ca). The former appears to be responsible for the upstroke of the action potential, while the latter may act as a pacemaker current.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAnthracenesBariumCaffeineCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersChloride ChannelsChloridesFemaleIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMuscle, SmoothNifedipineNiflumic AcidPatch-Clamp Techniques9-anthroic acidAnthracenesBariumCaffeineCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersChloride ChannelsChloridesNifedipineNiflumic Acid

Identifiers

PMID9409476
PMCPMC1160098
OpenAlexW2101401733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.