Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9407034›Full record

ArticleGenes & development1997

The preference for GT-rich DNA by the yeast Rad51 protein defines a set of universal pairing sequences.

R B Tracy, J K Baumohl, S C Kowalczykowski

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R B TracyDivision of Biological Sciences, Sections of Microbiology and of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.
J K Baumohl
S C Kowalczykowski
Microbiology Society · GBUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

MECHANISTIC STUDIES OF GENETIC RECOMBINATIONR01AI018987 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KOWALCZYKOWSKI, STEPHEN CHARLES · 1985 to 1999
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI-18987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rad51 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a eukaryotic homolog of the RecA protein, the prototypic DNA strand-exchange protein of Escherichia coli. RAD51 gene function is required for efficient genetic recombination and for DNA double-strand break repair. Recently, we demonstrated that RecA protein has a preferential affinity for GT-rich DNA sequences-several of which exhibit enhanced RecA protein-promoted homologous pairing activity. The fundamental similarity between the RecA and Rad51 proteins suggests that Rad51 might display an analogous bias. Using in vitro selection, here we show that the yeast Rad51 protein shares the same preference for GT-rich sequences as its prokaryotic counterpart. This bias is also manifest as an increased ability of Rad51 protein to promote the invasion of supercoiled DNA by homologous GT-rich single-stranded DNA, an activity not previously described for the eukaryotic pairing protein. We propose that the preferred utilization of GT-rich sequences is a conserved feature among all homologs of RecA protein, and that GT-rich regions are loci for increased genetic exchange in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNADNA-Binding ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataNucleotidesRad51 RecombinaseRec A RecombinasesRecombination, GeneticSequence Homology, Amino AcidDNADNA-Binding ProteinsNucleotidesRad51 RecombinaseRec A Recombinases

Identifiers

PMID9407034
PMCPMC316816
OpenAlexW2158120167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.